@InProceedings{Fujisaki2010_535,
author = {Hiroya Fujisaki},
booktitle = {Studientexte zur Sprachkommunikation: Elektronische Sprachsignalverarbeitung 2010},
title = {In Search of Models — A Review of the Author’s Research over a Half Century},
year = {2010},
editor = {Hansjörg Mixdorff},
month = mar,
pages = {29--30},
publisher = {TUDpress, Dresden},
abstract = {In this talk I will start by defining what I mean by a ‘model’ and by emphasizing the importance of creating a proper model for the phenomenon under study. What is meant by a proper model is not just an ad hoc mathematical approximation of what one superficially observes, but one that is based on understanding of the underlying principle. I will then show four examples of such models I developed during my research career of over the past 50 years. 1. A model for the humanuse of language in sending and receiving information By looking into the processes involved in the use of language in sending and receiving information, this work shows that the two aspects are quite different and their characteristics require separate mathematical formulations. A model for the human processesof controlling the fundamental frequency of speech By examining the underlying mechanisms, this work explains why formulating the fundamental frequency contour in terms of logarithmic frequency leads to a precise model and separation of two types of components related to phrasing and accentuation, respectively, and why the two components have shapes of response curves of second-order linear systems. A model for the humanprocesses involved in identification and discrimination By critically analyzing the cognitive processes involved in identification and discrimination experiments, this work shows the mathematical relationship between the two processes and hence between the two performance curves, and proves that the so-called phenomenon of categorical perception is an artifact coming from the experimental paradigm. A modelfor the process of dialogue By looking into the process of dialogue, this work clearly shows that the finite-state automaton often used in modeling a dialogue is inadequate, and presents a novelalternative way of modeling a dialogue in terms of two interacting finite-state automata that are different from conventional finite-state automata. In summary, it is the author’s belief that one needs to go beyond conventional views, but proper models are often based on the commonsense.},
isbn = {978-3-941298-85-9},
issn = {0940-6832},
keywords = {Session in Honor of Hiroya Fujisaki},
url = {https://www.essv.de/pdf/2010_29_30.pdf},
}